请在 下方输入 要搜索的题目:

A case comes before the Supreme Court concerning the Interpretation of a provision in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The appellant argues that the court should follow a recent line of decisions from the European Court on Human Rights (the ECtHR Judgments'), which provide a clear interpretation of the provision. The respondent argues that the court is free to make Its own Interpretation of Article 8.Which of the following best explains how the Supreme Court should treat the ECtHR judgments?


A、The Supreme Court should depart from the ECtHR judgments if it finds that it is right to do so.
B、The Supreme Court is free to ignore the ECtHR judgments.
C、The Supreme Court should follow the ECtHR judgments.
D、The Supreme Court should interpret the Article 8 provision more broadly than the ECtHR judgments.
E、The Supreme Court should interpret the Article 8 provision more narrowly than the ECtHR judgments.

发布时间:2025-07-21 02:39:28
推荐参考答案 ( 由 快搜搜题库 官方老师解答 )
联系客服
答案:C
专业技术学习
专业技术学习
搜搜题库系统